Well, after taking a few and played thousands of hands at NL100 I'll talk a little differences between NL50 and NL100, since similar levels although these differences exist.
The first and obvious is that there are fewer fishes. Tables remains a player with 30, 40, 50 ... VPIP, but are less and are more midstacked / Shortstack. Well, it's logical given that you play for more money, and people willing to give away their cash is becoming less.
Another difference is quite noticeable is that more short stacks at the tables, which pushes a lot of players but I do not dislike. Players remain basically burn your money trying to post-flop bluff low, so adjust the game and make calls too loose on the flop is critical ... This should result in increased "False" the WTSD.
But the biggest difference is the change in the regulars. The typical regular NL50, at least in ipoker in full ring, is a super player nit, with numbers like 7 / 4, 7 / 5, 8 / 5, 9 / 6 ... eg I have a dear 10 / 2 by more than 50,000 hands swarming the tables. They are players who always want to have in our tables because they give the blinds are extremely exploitable, its range of limp is a card that says: "22-99: resúbeme when not cruising the set on the flop I'm going to shoot. Nothing, "and give us an extremely easy to insulate with loose players at the table. In contrast, NL100 the vast majority of the regulars are players that can denfinir as semi-TAG. The vast majority play 12 / 9, 3bet usually have between 4 and 5 and attempted. steal of 25-28%, mainly because they steal under little cut-off and sb. Do not be fooled by low as his 3bet and steal, these players know what they do and take out the money is not as easy as a lot less to exploit a 7 / 5, are two entirely different things.
One thing that really catches my attention is that are ranked call-to-3bet rather loose, despite playing a very tight estadÃsitcas. The fold-to-3bet generally around 50%, which does not help us much to play against them because their early and middle ranges are too small and for that we have to eat a lot of the coconut with our range of 3bet. & # 160, But of late, know what exact range of fold to 3bet has a 12 / 9 would be something fundamental if we have position on him preflop. If it is too high you can reraise with a huge range of hands looking away preflop fold equity, whereas if we hold too many hands to look their fold 3bet CBET in pots and see if we can draw post-flop, or if we should reduce our capacity and bring powerful hands to showdown. (In matters of this kind, ranging from 3bet, 4bet and things like that, saying that the translation of the article in The Bryce and Leatherass stands for now. In addition, also & # 233; n is the fourth article that comes with the HM, "facing a preflop 3bet, very similar, and finally the recent article by Sir Donald, one that is more general but clear ideas who do not know how to address these calculations.)
Another thing I do lately is regular enough to have a look at their graphics and nonshowdown showdown winnings. Know of a stroke if he wins less money maso one way or another is important to address the game against him, two players with stats 'external' factors may have very similar plots nonsd sd and truly different, implying that the time to decide his game will necessarily have to be very different, as the benefits arising from different spots, know that may be crucial for interpreting flop raise a stat as CBET, where re-raised to know that, eg "20%" is of little use unless we know what makes that player with top pair or second pair in those cases, since that depends on it index number indicates a normal-high or a low bluff.
Anyway, nice to write even a little about poker here on the blog too, because it is something that had a little left. Greetings to all!
0 comments:
Post a Comment