say that Messi is an unfair Golden Ball winner, is being stingy with the Argentine deployed throughout the year. Xavi and Iniesta are two great players, certainly deserved the podium or even over Cristiano Ronaldo Sneijder. So far so good, but the fierce debates truly begin when we try to compare the three players cules. Taking first things done by Barcelona in the year, Messi takes for some to the English prodigious as his dribbling and left foot have been crucial to move forward more than a match for Barça. You could also say something similar to Xavi and Iniesta, but the Argentine production was higher, that until the English agree.
South Africa puts red-hot election
But the point that triggers all the criticisms against this golden ball originates from South Africa where the English team displayed a great game thanks largely to the fact to Iniesta, Xavi, Casillas and Villa, where even the same FIFA and many critics agreed that Villa were the better team (Got the ball at the World bronze), followed by the finesse and elegance of Iniesta and Xavi after. I also agree that. 'El Guaje' was too high and without it, I venture to say that Spain had not had echo champion and suitcases in the group stage as only he and his individuality or his mischief in the last mile and a quality striker pulled out of gaps in entering the Iberian team was not perfect championship game, please do not forget that.
Conclusions
You look at the Barcelona games and there are doubts that today the best left-hander, who throughout the year was the best football gave us and that their potential off when playing style that is already used to the boat: as a team, setting up walls, with partners who think like him. These partners today are the best companions you could have: Villa, Pedro, Xavi and Iniesta among the most important. One theory I have and that is also used by many is that if Messi played a regular-global evil was for (in addition to technical ineptitude) did not find those partners that are so used to explode and while for some moves and genius Iniesta, Xavi and Messi not need a partner, but for several other themselves in need.
The English played the World Cup 8 -7 points Messi only 5 in the rest of the year I put Messi a English 9 and 8-7. But how many games the Argentine played less than 7 points? Only 3, and while they were in the world and that weighs very much believe that it is not enough to condemn it is clear that had the best performance in 2010. Can say that Iniesta could also win, and if so I would say if they have their arguments because this played better in the 3 most important weeks of football in the last 4 years. But do not say that Messi does not deserve and that is unfair, do not say that.
[Few readers, I have some public service announcements:
1st I opened a video blog with my friend and we are trying to post every day our nonsense if they want to take a look at this vlog newborn dense around down here: http://vlogito.blogspot.com/
2do that I am also open the blog doors of literary criticism and drama (as if he knew a lot of it!), so for the most http://criticasdeuninexperto.blogspot.com/ boring visit but as I still do not post, but it is half an extensive post with item analysis, formal characteristics and good stuff it just boring writers might like minded people. 'll Let you know when to come out my first post on Cyrano de Bergerac play that is still in the square Isil. 3rd
that the slogan of this year is at least 3 posts a week on Blessing Damn, what about, I do? see = P]