Today I wonder why some "digital rights advocates are" against a popular manifstación ,
that will only be seen as democratic expression that participants take to the streets
cut traffic and affect public or private transport and thereby harm the average citizen, the strikes organized by unions
or demonstrations by some political parties.
Manifestations
which otherwise often lead to riots and police charges on which almost always takes the stick
the least fault is, ie who simply exercised their right to be manifest.
Again it is evident that the network is an open book, perhaps the last, so the social rejection that no one can try to seize it.
That these things happen is nothing more than the actual source of discontent and unease about the injustices that are suffering the majority of the citizenry by the administration and its minions.
What has to be clear is that these actions are not by any organized gang or by armed armies
cause these actions are a multitude of people of all ages, countries, different ideas and different levels of society.
not seem appropriate to me that the AI \u200b\u200bis a fine for something that is not law and it was done, I do not think it appropriate to charge fees at festivals and is beneficial.
I do not think anything legal to continue paying the digital rate (fee) and are still paying.
is used to court to sue software developers or web links to abusive prosecutions.
seems much less appropriate committees to be formed outside the justice censor and close sites. (Act Sinde)
I firmly believe that any act of civic protest without violence or destruction of public or private property is only an act of freedom and a strong signal of discontent from one part of society and especially to each group must have the freedom to express it as you like, following the law as in this case.
Director of Institutional Relations of Google Spain, Barbara Navarro said during the course 'Data protection, information technology and education system, held in Valencia headquarters of the International University Menéndez Pelayo
The desire to protect the rights should not stop the advance of information society.
Society evolves and the age of computer, telecommunications and the currency crisis would be nice to understand that
is more reasonable instead of stopping city traffic, burning containers, break windows and police loads ,
make the protest in places where they are attacking the interests of citizens without violence and without harming anyone.
The País.com in an article entitled: Why am SGAE is trending topic, http://plink.es/ydw include:
Some people see this as the future of the protests. Do you foresee that there may be protests like this the next step in another source? A: Sure. As for the protests, I hope that the future of the protests is ACTION. No walking in circles with useless signs that everyone ignores.
But
Anonymous 4Chan and you never know. And after much publicity as is happening in the media to share, if a kid reads this and points to the DDOS attack should it be considered part of Anonymous? Is the mere announcement that the web is going to drop a self-fulfilling prophecy? It is difficult to find the limits. Legislation and are being prepared: the new English Penal Code which comes into force on December 23 incorporates the crime of "damage computer" and DDOS type attacks punishable by up to three years imprisonment.
The story behind "Operation Payback" is exciting, and provides for hours of browsing and thinking about who is this faceless enemy that has left the virtual environment to give headaches even to the very real SGAE . I do not know if it will be the future of the protests, but in the background is the question of whether internet is used for mobilization (which, incidentally, is the fashionable debate in the U.S.). For now, I am left with one of the slogans of Anonymous: "We are legion."
The reality is that the fall of a website can also be caused by other technical reasons unprovoked (incidents) and in these cases no one puts his hands to his head.
I am quite sure now that actions like this are repeated as the network is nothing more than a media and public
while multinational groups can use it to obtain economic benefits the citizen walk it used as a means of free expression, that is one reason why some Internet users are concerned about the Net Neutrality
David Bravo: An attack DDoS is PROMUSICAE demand Pablo Soto. They put so much paper in court to answer that you just dropped.
0 comments:
Post a Comment