much we strive and we tell the same techniques used by propagandists political parties after election win-win even losing the election, the importance of this resolution is that both companies public administration or fatten the coffers of the institutions management issue, besides that in the case of public administration is borne by all citizens and in the case of SMEs expensive services and the acquisition of supplies and equipment.
In fact, the canon (compensation for private copying) is not illegal, is illegal as they have applied the English administration organizations
digital canon, remember that companies (producing video or audio) were already exempt from paying the fee in the magnetic material (video tapes, audio and analog recording devices) the most incredible present case is that the implementation of digital canon does not do the same. Now the logical thing would
that what they have taken illegally and that if it has been shown, he is returned to state coffers and businesses who have been victims of illegal collection of digital canon, which is what determined the decision of the ECJ.
All statements made I prefer the Javier de la Cueva:
is a step in the right direction, that is to pay only for what it is used for private copying. The legality of the fee was never in doubt of what is doubted is indiscriminate in its application that included the State, businesses and professionals. And it involves a huge loss of revenue to the management entities intellectual property, which they defended in the European Court indiscriminate application. This Court has given no reason.
0 comments:
Post a Comment