in English stands for Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (anti-counterfeiting trade agreement). Is an international treaty that aims to implement during the year 2010. Is being discussed in secret since October 2007. Has leaked from government officials who are in against ineffective, inhumane, illegal and murky nature of this treaty.
Countries affected by this agreement include, but are not limited to: Australia, Canada, EU, Japan, Republic of Korea, Mexico, Morocco, New Zealand, Singapore, Switzerland and the U.S..
The official aim of the agreement is the strong international enforcement of intellectual property rights. Some of our concerns are vague and amorphous way in which "falsificasión" (1) is used in many public comments. These uses range from products to expressly illegal unquestionably legitimate generics. We believe that the ACT has the potential to limit innovation the consumer choice and freedom on the Internet due to its many restrictions and changes in the legal field of copyright.
The scope of ACT includes counterfeit products, and new Internet censorship laws irrational downloads and gives what is called "Internet piracy." ACTA is a deal that surpasses many legal precedents and case law (2) in their own country that defines rights of consumers as "fair use" and could eliminate some limitations on the enforcement of intellectual property. This means that ACT could be subrogated (3) any legislation in your country to apply harsher penalties, unfair and ineffective people suspected of piracy without trial in court. If you were merely suspected of illegally listening to tunes or upload any illegal content could be severely punished by the laws of their own country. ACTA
also ensures that ISPs are legally responsible for the discharge of its users. ACT provides the record companies more rights to enforce copyright (c) and law enforcement officers permission to search material protected by copyright (c) any digital device. Have you paid you for the songs on your iPod? Under this new law you could be quickly branded as a criminal in the same category of murderers and rapists. Will have his criminal record. Even if you did not go below your iPod songs to feel the effect of millions or possibly billions of taxpayer dollars spent on prosecuting these "criminals", money that could be used to save lives. ACTA
Parties consider that any person accused of copyright infringement should "compensate" the loss in revenue to record companies. They call for harsher punishments for these offenders. The company in question, as UMG (4), billed more than one billion dollars in 2009 but the RIAA (Recording Industries Association of America) recently sued a 12 year old girl and many others for their discharges. Pursue compensation ranging up to one hundred fifty thousand dollars for mp3 song How far are intended to reach? (5) ......
Translator (Pabloha, http://pabloha.com.ar
0 comments:
Post a Comment